Showing posts with label foreclosure crisis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label foreclosure crisis. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

The Truth Behind the Numbers on Declining Foreclosures

Recent first quarter research from numerous sources supports industry sentiment that the bottom of the current real estate cycle has been reached, and the new cycle has begun. In an unlikely alliance, government, the private sector, and even the media have all identified the unrelenting wave of foreclosures as the source of the problem and directed all of their efforts to hunting down the beast and killing it. Based on recent numbers, the foreclosure crisis could appear to be contained. According to the numbers:


• Overall foreclosure filings are down 19% -- their lowest level in four years.
• The volume of “pre-foreclosure” sales hit a record 109,593 transactions as homeowners and banks adopted short sales as a preemptive strike to losing their homes.
• Analysts monitoring mortgage delinquency rates, the accepted metric predicting foreclosure volume, are reporting continuing month-over-month declines in delinquencies.
• Credit-reporting agencies, well known for keeping falling FICO scores top of mind, are now proud to report that consumers shed mortgage debt to the tune of $350 billion over the last year and are continuing to trim the fat.

• The Obama Administration’s assault on the housing crisis through no less than 12 separate programs since 2009 have provided millions of distressed homeowners permanent modifications, refinancing opportunities, forbearances, short sale incentives and even in some cases, mortgage forgiveness.


While these are impressive metrics, the real estate industry would be wise to season its interpretation of the data with a dose of skeptical pragmatism. Too much emphasis is being placed on surveys and reports to validate a recovery instead of taking a hard look at what is transpiring on a day-by-day and case-by-case. Albeit mitigated, the foreclosure crisis is still very much alive and well.


When the pundits are silenced, and the analysts are deprived of their spreadsheets, what remains is a staggering number of homeowners, over 3.5 million, having lost their homes since 2008. No metric accurately represents this devastation on families, their surrounding communities, and the overall economy. Granted, foreclosure filings are at record low levels and continue to fall. Nevertheless, nearly 200,000 new borrowers received Notices of Default during the first quarter of 2012.

Looking at the crisis from the lender perspective, the numbers don’t fully portray the battle lenders face to minimize losses. While data publicizing lower defaults points to a possible end to the drag of REO on lender balance sheets, that end is years away and the current cost of loss mitigation has proven to be expensive. Case in point: recent settlements with individual states over foreclosure improprieties cost lenders $25 billion, and still provide loopholes for more claims. Tougher standards implemented to avoid lax processing of foreclosure filings require more auditing and personnel to implement. And clearly, lenders have been forced to accept larger losses on REOs and to embrace short sales to prevent further hemorrhaging. In short, the numbers use a wide brush to paint a possible outcome of the foreclosure crisis, but ignore the present reality that homes are still being lost today.


A more holistic approach is needed to properly measure the effectiveness of the war on foreclosures. To be fair, the real estate industry and consumers alike should feel real hope as a result of data showing a consistent downward trend in new foreclosures quarter after quarter. The housing industry is at its strongest place in three years and is getting stronger. However, we shouldn’t allow backwards-looking or forward-projecting reports distract us from the ever-present reality of the severity of the foreclosure crisis. Conditions are improving, but the battle is far from over. Success is measured not by aggregate numbers, but by one homeowner at a time who avoids a foreclosure.



Friday, May 4, 2012

How Reducing Foreclosure Inventories Impact the Real Estate Recovery

Nearly halfway through 2012, the real estate industry is making headway in finding prescriptive solutions to return to some state of stability. An improving economy and increased government involvement in modulating anti-foreclosure programs has caused many real estate pundits to declare the housing crisis near its end. And while these factors play a pivotal role in restoring equilibrium to the market, what could be the most significant indication that the” light at the end of the tunnel” is not just a myth is the slow and steady erosion of the inventory of distressed properties on the market.
It’s no secret that the saturation of distressed assets on the market has driven home values down, underwriting standards for new mortgages higher, and prospective buyers out of the market during the first years of the housing downturn. As the dust of 2011 settled, however, we saw the emergence of certain forces continuing into this year that are helping to shrink the numbers of distressed assets. Lower distressed home values gave rise to the all-cash investor with a voracious appetite and deep pockets for bargains. The government even stole a page from the investor playbook by piloting a bulk REO to Rentals program in 2012. Investors are enjoying healthy returns as a result of the popularity of single-family residential housing over multifamily housing, and are on the lookout for more deals.

Ironically, the banks themselves proved the next major force that emerged as a key factor in reducing distressed inventories. Or more accurately stated -- a shift in bank policy toward previously-disdained workout solutions. Banks finally did the math that everyone else did and realized it was cheaper to accept a lower value through short sales than let a property languish on its asset sheets. Banks not only embraced short sales, they proactively reached out to distressed borrowers to consider short sales as a way out with huge incentives in store for them if they sold. Moreover, other workout solutions such as deed-in-lieu or “cash-for-keys” programs gained favor with lenders as they sought more drastic solutions to reduce existing inventories. One lender is even experimenting with a long-overdue twist to the deed-in-lieu solution by taking back title and renting the property back to the distressed homeowner at a rate lower than their mortgage payment.

The combination of private investors and lender initiatives, with a healthy dash of regulatory pressure has resulted in such an alarming decrease in housing inventory that values on non-distressed properties have not only bottomed out, but risen in select markets. And while not nearly approaching the volume of the housing boom in the last decade, multiple offers on properties have returned. Shrinking foreclosure inventories coupled with other key indicators such as falling mortgage delinquencies and more promising employment statistics seem to reflect a healthier real estate sector.

What does this mean for real estate professionals? Agents, brokers, and other ancillary real estate service providers should see increased activity compared to 2010 and 2011, but to make the most of new opportunities must be able to handle complex transactions involving distressed assets. Any investors that have been sitting on the fence waiting for a true bottom to hit to find even more bargains may miss their window of opportunity if they don’t throw their hat into the ring now as the availability of discounted properties as investment vehicles will become harder to find. And as conditions improve, more sellers will be enticed to bring their homes to market demanding (and holding out for) a higher asking price. While a renewed sellers’ market with stronger pricing would of course be the best scenario for housing, investors will have to shift their strategy to take advantage of the market.

There’s indeed reason for renewed optimism that the worst of the real estate downturn is in the rear view mirror. The road ahead for real estate should prove less treacherous in the next cycle if travelled with a cautious strategy that includes finding more ways to liquidate distressed assets from the marketplace.